Re: [patch] x86: make UV support optional

[Jack Steiner]

On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:03:48AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> UV is fairly rare.... and much of the support is already there to cope with
> 32-bit builds. So this makes sense I think.
>


Looks ok to me. One suggestion though. There is a MAXSMP config
option. I would suggest enabling UV if MAXSMP is enabled. This
will help ensure that UV is tested more frequently & may minimize
regressions.


--- jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/