Re: [PATCH] CRED: Fix regression in cap_capable() as shown up by sys_faccessat() [ver #2]

[David Howells]

Serge E. Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yes, I'm sorry, I've been staring at it on and off all weekend...  From
> a high level it looks right, but i think there's a problem with naming
> here (which also could be said to have obfuscated the original bug).
> The security_capable() should be security_capable_eff() or somesuch,
> and security_task_capable() should be security_task_capable_real() or
> something.

Yes.  We've got real and effective creds, each with effective caps.  It lends
itself to confusion most readily:-).

> In fact the current-as-implicit optimization could be put off for a kernel
> release or so while we just have security_capable_eff(tsk, cap) and
> security_real_eff(tsk, cap), or just security_capable(tsk, cap, flag) where
> flag is CAP_EFF or CAP_REAL.

I'd prefer not to add an extra argument like this, especially as CAP_EFF
shouldn't be used if tsk != current.  Furthermore, security_capable_eff() may
only be called with tsk == current.

OTOH, as I pointed out, the capable() op as I've modified it to be it is
superfluous given the task_capable() op since the cred pointer is sufficient
to distinguish which set of creds you want to observe.

Is the attached patch preferable, then?  I would prefer to go for the
optimisation in the common case, especially as the common case is called
rather a lot, but maybe the naming is more important...

> I'm also not thrilled about security_task_capable() and
> security_ops->task_capable() having different args and semantics, but
> of course I see the reason for it and figure if there's a way to improve
> on that we can do it later.

Well, security_ops->task_capable() should not be called, except by
security_task_capable*() and other security_ops->task_capable(), so does that
matter?

The reason for the way I've done things is that the creds from the specified
process need pinning in some way.  If I just pass the task pointer through,
then each function that needs to examine those creds must pin them for
itself.  With SELinux, that is both SELinux itself and commoncaps.

One thing I'm wondering is can I ditch the audit flag argument to the
task_capable() sec op if I make it contingent on tsk != NULL instead?  The
credentials are passed by cred pointer, so, currently, tsk is only needed for
auditing.

> Anyway David the patch on its own doesn't look incorrect.  So far
> the only code which manipulates subjective caps is in fact
> sys_faccessat through cap_set_effective() right?  If so this at
> least looks safe, looking through capable/has_capability callers.

fs/nfsd/auth.c also.

> Finally, may i just say that i love the fact that a syscall is
> checking the real user's access rights and so sets eff creds to
> have the caps of the real user :)

Yes, it's quite mad.

> Hmm, did you at one time call the subjective creds 'working' or 'acting'
> creds?  Might be a good name.  Subj/obj always makes me pause to think, and
> real/eff while seemingly natural could be confusing in cases like this.
> cap_set_acting() - i like it...

I was using acting and act_as.

David

---
diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h
index e22f48c..02bdb76 100644
--- a/include/linux/capability.h
+++ b/include/linux/capability.h
@@ -529,8 +529,21 @@ extern const kernel_cap_t __cap_init_eff_set;
  *
  * Note that this does not set PF_SUPERPRIV on the task.
  */
-#define has_capability(t, cap) (security_capable((t), (cap)) == 0)
-#define has_capability_noaudit(t, cap) (security_capable_noaudit((t), (cap)) == 0)
+#define has_capability(t, cap) (security_real_capable((t), (cap)) == 0)
+
+/**
+ * has_capability_noaudit - Determine if a task has a superior capability available (unaudited)
+ * @t: The task in question
+ * @cap: The capability to be tested for
+ *
+ * Return true if the specified task has the given superior capability
+ * currently in effect, false if not, but don't write an audit message for the
+ * check.
+ *
+ * Note that this does not set PF_SUPERPRIV on the task.
+ */
+#define has_capability_noaudit(t, cap) \
+	(security_real_capable_noaudit((t), (cap)) == 0)
 
 extern int capable(int cap);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index b92b5e4..1f2ab63 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -48,7 +48,8 @@ struct audit_krule;
  * These functions are in security/capability.c and are used
  * as the default capabilities functions
  */
-extern int cap_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap, int audit);
+extern int cap_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, const struct cred *cred,
+		       int cap, int audit);
 extern int cap_settime(struct timespec *ts, struct timezone *tz);
 extern int cap_ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *child, unsigned int mode);
 extern int cap_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *parent);
@@ -1251,9 +1252,12 @@ static inline void security_free_mnt_opts(struct security_mnt_opts *opts)
  *	@permitted contains the permitted capability set.
  *	Return 0 and update @new if permission is granted.
  * @capable:
- *	Check whether the @tsk process has the @cap capability.
+ *	Check whether the @tsk process has the @cap capability in the indicated
+ *	credentials.
  *	@tsk contains the task_struct for the process.
+ *	@cred contains the credentials to use.
  *	@cap contains the capability <include/linux/capability.h>.
+ *	@audit: Whether to write an audit message or not
  *	Return 0 if the capability is granted for @tsk.
  * @acct:
  *	Check permission before enabling or disabling process accounting.  If
@@ -1346,7 +1350,8 @@ struct security_operations {
 		       const kernel_cap_t *effective,
 		       const kernel_cap_t *inheritable,
 		       const kernel_cap_t *permitted);
-	int (*capable) (struct task_struct *tsk, int cap, int audit);
+	int (*capable) (struct task_struct *tsk, const struct cred *cred,
+			int cap, int audit);
 	int (*acct) (struct file *file);
 	int (*sysctl) (struct ctl_table *table, int op);
 	int (*quotactl) (int cmds, int type, int id, struct super_block *sb);
@@ -1628,8 +1633,9 @@ int security_capset(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old,
 		    const kernel_cap_t *effective,
 		    const kernel_cap_t *inheritable,
 		    const kernel_cap_t *permitted);
-int security_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap);
-int security_capable_noaudit(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap);
+int security_capable(int cap);
+int security_real_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap);
+int security_real_capable_noaudit(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap);
 int security_acct(struct file *file);
 int security_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int op);
 int security_quotactl(int cmds, int type, int id, struct super_block *sb);
@@ -1826,14 +1832,31 @@ static inline int security_capset(struct cred *new,
 	return cap_capset(new, old, effective, inheritable, permitted);
 }
 
-static inline int security_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap)
+static inline int security_capable(int cap)
 {
-	return cap_capable(tsk, cap, SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT);
+	return cap_capable(current, current_cred(), cap, SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT);
 }
 
-static inline int security_capable_noaudit(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap)
+static inline int security_real_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap)
 {
-	return cap_capable(tsk, cap, SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT);
+	int ret;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	ret = cap_capable(tsk, __task_cred(tsk), cap, SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static inline
+int security_real_capable_noaudit(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	ret = cap_capable(tsk, __task_cred(tsk), cap,
+			       SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static inline int security_acct(struct file *file)
diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
index c598d9d..688926e 100644
--- a/kernel/capability.c
+++ b/kernel/capability.c
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ int capable(int cap)
 		BUG();
 	}
 
-	if (has_capability(current, cap)) {
+	if (security_capable(cap) == 0) {
 		current->flags |= PF_SUPERPRIV;
 		return 1;
 	}
diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
index 7971354..f0e671d 100644
--- a/security/commoncap.c
+++ b/security/commoncap.c
@@ -45,26 +45,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cap_netlink_recv);
 /**
  * cap_capable - Determine whether a task has a particular effective capability
  * @tsk: The task to query
+ * @cred: The credentials to use
  * @cap: The capability to check for
  * @audit: Whether to write an audit message or not
  *
  * Determine whether the nominated task has the specified capability amongst
  * its effective set, returning 0 if it does, -ve if it does not.
  *
- * NOTE WELL: cap_capable() cannot be used like the kernel's capable()
- * function.  That is, it has the reverse semantics: cap_capable() returns 0
- * when a task has a capability, but the kernel's capable() returns 1 for this
- * case.
+ * NOTE WELL: cap_has_capability() cannot be used like the kernel's capable()
+ * and has_capability() functions.  That is, it has the reverse semantics:
+ * cap_has_capability() returns 0 when a task has a capability, but the
+ * kernel's capable() and has_capability() returns 1 for this case.
  */
-int cap_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap, int audit)
+int cap_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, const struct cred *cred, int cap,
+		int audit)
 {
-	__u32 cap_raised;
-
-	/* Derived from include/linux/sched.h:capable. */
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	cap_raised = cap_raised(__task_cred(tsk)->cap_effective, cap);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-	return cap_raised ? 0 : -EPERM;
+	return cap_raised(cred->cap_effective, cap) ? 0 : -EPERM;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -160,7 +156,8 @@ static inline int cap_inh_is_capped(void)
 	/* they are so limited unless the current task has the CAP_SETPCAP
 	 * capability
 	 */
-	if (cap_capable(current, CAP_SETPCAP, SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT) == 0)
+	if (cap_capable(current, current_cred(), CAP_SETPCAP,
+			SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT) == 0)
 		return 0;
 #endif
 	return 1;
@@ -869,7 +866,8 @@ int cap_task_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
 		     & (new->securebits ^ arg2))			/*[1]*/
 		    || ((new->securebits & SECURE_ALL_LOCKS & ~arg2))	/*[2]*/
 		    || (arg2 & ~(SECURE_ALL_LOCKS | SECURE_ALL_BITS))	/*[3]*/
-		    || (cap_capable(current, CAP_SETPCAP, SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT) != 0) /*[4]*/
+		    || (cap_capable(current, current_cred(), CAP_SETPCAP,
+				    SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT) != 0)		/*[4]*/
 			/*
 			 * [1] no changing of bits that are locked
 			 * [2] no unlocking of locks
@@ -950,7 +948,8 @@ int cap_vm_enough_memory(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages)
 {
 	int cap_sys_admin = 0;
 
-	if (cap_capable(current, CAP_SYS_ADMIN, SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT) == 0)
+	if (cap_capable(current, current_cred(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
+			SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT) == 0)
 		cap_sys_admin = 1;
 	return __vm_enough_memory(mm, pages, cap_sys_admin);
 }
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 678d4d0..c3586c0 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -154,14 +154,32 @@ int security_capset(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old,
 				    effective, inheritable, permitted);
 }
 
-int security_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap)
+int security_capable(int cap)
 {
-	return security_ops->capable(tsk, cap, SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT);
+	return security_ops->capable(current, current_cred(), cap,
+				     SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT);
 }
 
-int security_capable_noaudit(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap)
+int security_real_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap)
 {
-	return security_ops->capable(tsk, cap, SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT);
+	const struct cred *cred;
+	int ret;
+
+	cred = get_task_cred(tsk);
+	ret = security_ops->capable(tsk, cred, cap, SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT);
+	put_cred(cred);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int security_real_capable_noaudit(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap)
+{
+	const struct cred *cred;
+	int ret;
+
+	cred = get_task_cred(tsk);
+	ret = security_ops->capable(tsk, cred, cap, SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT);
+	put_cred(cred);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 int security_acct(struct file *file)
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index dbeaa78..e0cb106 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -1433,12 +1433,13 @@ static int current_has_perm(const struct task_struct *tsk,
 
 /* Check whether a task is allowed to use a capability. */
 static int task_has_capability(struct task_struct *tsk,
+			       const struct cred *cred,
 			       int cap, int audit)
 {
 	struct avc_audit_data ad;
 	struct av_decision avd;
 	u16 sclass;
-	u32 sid = task_sid(tsk);
+	u32 sid = cred_sid(cred);
 	u32 av = CAP_TO_MASK(cap);
 	int rc;
 
@@ -1865,15 +1866,16 @@ static int selinux_capset(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old,
 	return cred_has_perm(old, new, PROCESS__SETCAP);
 }
 
-static int selinux_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap, int audit)
+static int selinux_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, const struct cred *cred,
+			   int cap, int audit)
 {
 	int rc;
 
-	rc = secondary_ops->capable(tsk, cap, audit);
+	rc = secondary_ops->capable(tsk, cred, cap, audit);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
 
-	return task_has_capability(tsk, cap, audit);
+	return task_has_capability(tsk, cred, cap, audit);
 }
 
 static int selinux_sysctl_get_sid(ctl_table *table, u16 tclass, u32 *sid)
@@ -2037,7 +2039,8 @@ static int selinux_vm_enough_memory(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages)
 {
 	int rc, cap_sys_admin = 0;
 
-	rc = selinux_capable(current, CAP_SYS_ADMIN, SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT);
+	rc = selinux_capable(current, current_cred(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
+			     SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT);
 	if (rc == 0)
 		cap_sys_admin = 1;
 
@@ -2880,7 +2883,8 @@ static int selinux_inode_getsecurity(const struct inode *inode, const char *name
 	 * and lack of permission just means that we fall back to the
 	 * in-core context value, not a denial.
 	 */
-	error = selinux_capable(current, CAP_MAC_ADMIN, SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT);
+	error = selinux_capable(current, current_cred(), CAP_MAC_ADMIN,
+				SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT);
 	if (!error)
 		error = security_sid_to_context_force(isec->sid, &context,
 						      &size);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/