* FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In a few days, but wanted to hear back from either Jeremy or Becky first about how well they actually work in their usecases.Well, you don't need to wait, I think.
All Jeremy and Becky need is adding highmem support to swiotlb. How we support it doesn't matter. We can choose better one.
We all (including Jeremy) agreed that Becky's physical address scheme is better (simpler) than Jeremy's struct page and offset scheme. Surely, Becky's scheme works for Xen and him (Jeremy said that he tested it lightly).
Jeremy said, when he submitted this series, shortly before Christmas:
>> Here's a work in progress series [...]
>>
>> Quick testing showed no problems, but I haven't had the chance to do >> anything extensive.
Jeremy, did you have a chance to do more testing with the current tip/master bits on Xen, so that we can push it to Linus?