Re: swiotlb: remove duplicated #include

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Sun Jan 04 2009 - 17:48:54 EST


Ingo Molnar wrote:
* FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In a few days, but wanted to hear back from either Jeremy or Becky first about how well they actually work in their usecases.
Well, you don't need to wait, I think.

All Jeremy and Becky need is adding highmem support to swiotlb. How we support it doesn't matter. We can choose better one.

We all (including Jeremy) agreed that Becky's physical address scheme is better (simpler) than Jeremy's struct page and offset scheme. Surely, Becky's scheme works for Xen and him (Jeremy said that he tested it lightly).

Jeremy said, when he submitted this series, shortly before Christmas:

>> Here's a work in progress series [...]
>>
>> Quick testing showed no problems, but I haven't had the chance to do >> anything extensive.

Jeremy, did you have a chance to do more testing with the current tip/master bits on Xen, so that we can push it to Linus?

I'm going to be on vacation until the 12th, so I won't have a chance to do anything until then (perhaps Ian will have a chance to poke at them before then). I'm expecting Becky's patches to work as-is, or if not, be easily fixed with a couple of small bugfix patches. So I say go ahead if they work for everyone else.

J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/