Re: [PATCH 1/4] fastboot: Asynchronous function calls to speed upkernel boot

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:05:26 +0100
Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Surely the thread should die again boot up? On module load
> synchronisity is usually not a problem.

sadly that's not correct in practice based on the fast boot work we've
done.

> 
> Personally I think it would be better to make this more generic.
> Various subsystems have thread pool implementations now, 

sort of kinda. If a good one appears I'd be happy to build on top of
that, assuming it's generic enough.

> and this
> is just another variant that except for the sequence stuff
> isn't all that much different. So it would be better to have 
> a generic worker thread manager that just supports these
> barriers too.

... or maybe think about seeing this system as exactly that thread
manager?


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/