Re: [PULL] cpumask tree

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Also, while bisecting this window of commits i found that neither would 
> build successfully due to a typo - and the typo is fixed in 095fb96. So 
> since we rebase this portion anyway due to excessive amount of bugs, 
> i'll make it fully bisectable by rebasing right at 095fb96, backmerge 
> the fixlet from eeff031 and redo the whole series dropping the two bad 
> patches. Since this portion of the tree has no appreciable testing value 
> the rebase is the right thing to do here.

okay, i've done this now and pushed out the resulting tree to 
tip/cpus4096-v2. It is a no-content-changed reshuffle of the tail ~10 
commits of tip/cpus4096:

 $ git diff cpus4096..cpus4096-v2
 $

i dropped the two broken patches i bisected today, and backmerged a fixlet 
to make it more bisectable, and reordered fixes next to the merge point - 
and the new changes now come after that.

this finally is something that has no known regressions and looks pushable 
to Linus. I've started the -tip tests, lets see how well this holds up 
now.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/