Re: [RFC] cpualloc: improvements to per-cpu allocation

[Christoph Lameter]

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Rusty Russell wrote:

> I don't think it's a problem.  You still can't use them directly (this
> wording was not meant to imply that), but you can now hand their addresses
> to per_cpu_ptr() etc.  So zero-based x86-64 should Just Work.

Ok so this is going to be merged for 2.6.29? Its a good cleanup and a step
forward to our goals.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/