Re: Should <linux/serial.h> define __u32?

From: Mike Frysinger
Date: Mon Dec 29 2008 - 07:35:53 EST


On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 17:24, walt <w41ter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So, my question is: who should be responsible for defining
> that __u32, the author of serial.h or the author of the wine
> code that includes serial.h?

the kernel header should be doing #include <linux/serial.h>

if your distro doesnt patch their current headers to do this, then you
should open a bug report for them
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/