Re: [PATCH] ide: Fix ata_id_has_dword_io to return DWORD I/O support properly

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Friday 19 December 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Sure, we can always improve things further later.  However Mario's patch
> > is _definitely_ an improvement over the _current_ code.  Don't you agree?
> 
> No actually I don't. The current head dev code checks ATA > 7 as the
> indicator that this bit is used for treacherous computing. That means the
> behaviour for all the older drives is clearly back compatible with old
> Linux behaviour.
> 
> Doing it that way around means we don't have any worries about changing
> existing behaviours.

Please try to verify old Linux behaviour compatiblity statement with
some ATA-[2..7] devices...  They have old ATA-1 bit set to _zero_...

Mario: I don't have anymore time to spend on fixing libata problems so
I'll be leaving ata_id_has_dword_io() issues up to libata maintainers,
sorry for inconvenience!

Thanks,
Bart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/