Re: suspend/resume fails on second attempt in LNXVIDEO:00

[Justin P. Mattock]

Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2008-12-16 20:53:35, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>   
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 06:07:15PM +0000, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> >     
> > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:37:46 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > >       
> > > > I seem to be missing the original message, but: no, s2ram doesn't exist
> > > > in Ubuntu because pm-utils handles that role.
> > > >         
> > > Well, that's *their* argument but lots of people think otherwise.  There 
> > > appears to be no shortage of people for whom pm-utils does NOT work yet 
> > > s2ram does.  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uswsusp/+bug/134238
> > >       
> > The right answer to "This piece of software contains bugs" is not 
> > "Provide two pieces of software with the same features but different 
> > bugs". The only real functional difference between the two is that
> >     
>
> Yes, and that's why pm-utils should die: they have design problems
> (depend on hal, can't be pagelocked, unusable for suspend debugging).
> 									Pavel
>   
When using ubuntu intrepid, s2ram
did work, but instead of grabbing
the package from ubuntu, I used Debian
SID instead. (I have a tendency of mixing
packages);

regards;

Justin P. Mattock


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/