Re: [PATCH][RFC 2/23]: SCST core

From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Wed Dec 10 2008 - 14:11:04 EST


On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:30:37PM +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> This patch contains SCST core code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scst/Kconfig | 256 ++

Do not use "default n" - this is already the default value.

> drivers/scst/Makefile | 12
EXTRA_CFLAGS are deprecated in favour of ccflags-y


> drivers/scst/scst_cdbprobe.h | 519 +++++
static const struct scst_sdbops scst_scsi_op_table[]

This does not belong to a header file.


> drivers/scst/scst_lib.c | 3689 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/scst/scst_main.c | 1919 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/scst/scst_module.c | 69
> drivers/scst/scst_priv.h | 513 +++++
> drivers/scst/scst_targ.c | 5458 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 8 files changed, 12435 insertions(+)

There was a lot af TRACE_ENTRY() / TRACE_EXIT() noise.
We should have proper tools for that by now (I hope).

We often ask for exported symbols to be documented - so one has
a slight idea of their purpose.

CONFIG_SCST_STRICT_SERIALIZING has bad impact on readability.
Could this be abstracted better?


I did not look into the source in details. Just a few sparse comments.

Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/