Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Rework default handling of suspend and resume

From: Greg KH
Date: Sun Dec 07 2008 - 00:57:34 EST

On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 10:00:35AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > So, to fix the issue at hand, I'd like the $subject patch to go first. Then,
> > there is a major update of the new framework waiting for .29 in the Greg's
> > tree (that's the main reason why nobody uses it so far, BTW) and I'd really
> > prefer it to go next. After it's been merged, I'm going to add the mandatory
> > suspend-resume things (save state and go to a low power state on suspend,
> > restore state on resume) to the new framework in a separete patch.
> >
> > Is this plan acceptable?
> Sounds good to me. And assuming Jesse/Greg are all aboard, I'll just wait
> for the pull requests from Jesse and Greg.

No objection from me, I'll wait for Jesse to "go first" in the .29 merge


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at