Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] Protect cinit from fatal signals

From: Bastian Blank
Date: Tue Dec 02 2008 - 07:06:19 EST

On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 12:21:12PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Container-inits are special in some ways and this change requires SIGKILL
> to terminate them.

No. They have are not special from the outside namespace.

Also it was discussed to use pid namespaces to preserve the local pid of
a process during snapshot/restore. This means that every process may get
the state of a container-init. And then it is not longer a wise idea to
make them behave different from the outside.


I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth.
-- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3198.9
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at