Re: [PATCH] tracing/function-graph-tracer: adjustments of thetrace informations

[Ingo Molnar]

* Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Another thing that would be nice is to separate out the "cpu)" 
> > printing bits into a helper function. Right now what exists cannot be 
> > used in a seq-manner, so i couldnt reuse it.
> >
> 
> Isn't it the case with print_graph_cpu() ?

yeah, that should be okay. I didnt use it in verif_pid() because it 
returns print_line_t - but i guess it would be better to fix verif_pid() 
to check for !ret instead of the ret += thing i added.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/