Re: [PATCH] x86: uv bau interrupt -- use proper interrupt number

[Ingo Molnar]

* Cliff Wickman <cpw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:02:10AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> > +++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> > @@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ apicinterrupt IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR \
> >  	irq_move_cleanup_interrupt smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt
> >  #endif
> >  
> > -apicinterrupt 220 \
> > +apicinterrupt UV_BAU_MESSAGE \
> >  	uv_bau_message_intr1 uv_bau_message_interrupt
> >  apicinterrupt LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR \
> >  	apic_timer_interrupt smp_apic_timer_interrupt
> > --
> 
> The interrupt handler does not use the hardcoded 220, but
> the declaration should indeed be fixed as above.
> (such a fix was once submitted
>  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122350309029050&w=2  but didn't
>  go anywhere)
> Thanks for the follow-up.

applied to tip/x86/irq, thanks guys!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/