Re: [PATCH -next] at91rm9200 vs cpumask changes

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Alexey,

On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:39:13 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_time.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_time.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ static struct clock_event_device clkevt = {
>  	.features	= CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT,
>  	.shift		= 32,
>  	.rating		= 150,
> -	.cpumask	= CPU_MASK_CPU0,
>  	.set_next_event	= clkevt32k_next_event,
>  	.set_mode	= clkevt32k_mode,
>  };
> @@ -197,7 +196,7 @@ void __init at91rm9200_timer_init(void)
>  	clkevt.mult = div_sc(AT91_SLOW_CLOCK, NSEC_PER_SEC, clkevt.shift);
>  	clkevt.max_delta_ns = clockevent_delta2ns(AT91_ST_ALMV, &clkevt);
>  	clkevt.min_delta_ns = clockevent_delta2ns(2, &clkevt) + 1;
> -	clkevt.cpumask = cpumask_of_cpu(0);
> +	clkevt.cpumask = cpumask_of(0);
>  	clockevents_register_device(&clkevt);
>  
>  	/* register clocksource */

This patch is already in the rr tree today.  But thanks for the patch.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature