Re: [PATCH 18 of 38] x86: unify pci iommu setup and allow swiotlbto compile for 32 bit

From: FUJITA Tomonori
Date: Fri Nov 28 2008 - 01:29:18 EST


On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:14:47 +0000
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 12:43 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:36:49 +0000
> > Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 11:53 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > + BUG_ON(max_slots > 1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - IO_TLB_SHIFT));
> > > >
> > > > How can this BUG_ON happen? Using u64 for the mask is fine though.
> > >
> > > It covers the cases where the previous code would have overflowed. It
> > > can't happen right now because although mask is 64 bits the value
> > > assigned to it is currently sizeof(unsigned long). If someone changes
> > > the type of that field then we would start seeing unexpected values.
> >
> > If someone changes dma_get_seg_boundary to return a u64 value instead
> > of unsigned long, this BUG_ON could happen on 32bit architectures. But
> > you don't need to trigger BUG_ON for it. max_slots > 1UL <<
> > (BITS_PER_LONG - IO_TLB_SHIFT) should be fine for
> > iommu_is_span_boundary().
> >
> > Anyway, this is minor but would it be nice to make sure that anyone
> > can easily understand the code without digging into the git log?
> >
> > a) dropping this patch and adding some comments how the code works
> > (especially about the overflow on 32bit architectures).
> >
> > b) removing the BUG_ON in this patch and adding some comments.
>
> Yes, I think adding a comment to the existing code (option a) would be
> best.

Yeah, that should be fine.


> I actually have a small queue of other fixes which make swiotlb
> work properly for x86 PAE and HighMem but they are not particularly well
> baked at the moment. I'll include a patch to add a comment in that
> series.

I see.


Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/