RE: acpi_evaluate_integer broken by design

From: Moore, Robert
Date: Tue Nov 25 2008 - 13:42:30 EST


I agree, it should be allocated on the stack, like it is most everywhere else.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-acpi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-acpi-
>owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pavel Machek
>Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 3:05 AM
>To: kernel list; ACPI mailing list; Brown, Len
>Subject: acpi_evaluate_integer broken by design
>
>
>Now I know why I had strange "scheduling in atomic" problems:
>acpi_evaluate_integer() does malloc(..., irqs_disabled() ? GFP_ATOMIC
>: GFP_KERNEL)... which is (of course) broken.
>
>There's no way to reliably tell if we need GFP_ATOMIC or not from
>code, this one for example fails to detect spinlocks held.
>
>Fortunately, allocation seems small enough to be done on stack.
>
>Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
>
>diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
>index e827be3..f844941 100644
>--- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
>+++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
>@@ -259,34 +259,26 @@ acpi_evaluate_integer(acpi_handle handle
> struct acpi_object_list *arguments, unsigned long long
>*data)
> {
> acpi_status status = AE_OK;
>- union acpi_object *element;
>+ union acpi_object element;
> struct acpi_buffer buffer = { 0, NULL };
>
>-
> if (!data)
> return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
>
>- element = kzalloc(sizeof(union acpi_object), irqs_disabled() ?
>GFP_ATOMIC: GFP_KERNEL);
>- if (!element)
>- return AE_NO_MEMORY;
>-
> buffer.length = sizeof(union acpi_object);
>- buffer.pointer = element;
>+ buffer.pointer = &element;
> status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, pathname, arguments, &buffer);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> acpi_util_eval_error(handle, pathname, status);
>- kfree(element);
> return status;
> }
>
>- if (element->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
>+ if (element.type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
> acpi_util_eval_error(handle, pathname, AE_BAD_DATA);
>- kfree(element);
> return AE_BAD_DATA;
> }
>
>- *data = element->integer.value;
>- kfree(element);
>+ *data = element.integer.value;
>
> ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Return value [%llu]\n", *data));
>
>
>
>
>--
>(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
>(cesky, pictures)
>http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/