Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmiotrace: fix buffer overrun detection

[Pekka Paalanen]

On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:34:13 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Sure - applied them to tip/tracing/urgent:
> 
>   fb91ee6: tracing, doc: update mmiotrace documentation
>   7ee1768: x86, mmiotrace: fix buffer overrun detection
> 
> Does this make mmiotrace fully functional in .28 ?

Oh right, the busylooping bug when echoing into trace_marker,
I already forgot about that, since I couldn't reproduce it.
I guess there's nothing to do, until someone finds a way to
reproduce it.

I could speculate about buffer wrap-around issues or such, but
that requires some serious code reviewing. Btw. C-c'ing didn't
interrupt the shell while spinning. The spinning ended when I
switched the tracer or disabled it, IIRC.

(This is related to 2.6.28-rc6.)

On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, Pekka Paalanen wrote:

> There's also another issue, but I am not sure how to reproduce it.
> The symptom is, that
> echo whatever > /debug/tracing/trace_marker
> gets stuck in a loop, bash eats 100% CPU: 10% user, 90% system.
> I got that twice today, like this: after a fresh boot echoing 64, 200,
> 70 to trace_entries, switching between nop and mmiotrace tracers,
> echoing 0 or 1 to tracing_enabled, and running the testmmiotrace
> module. At some point the user marker got stuck.
> 
> But then I tried to do that a third time by repeating some usage
> patterns I thought might trigger it, but it didn't happen.


-- 
Pekka Paalanen
http://www.iki.fi/pq/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/