Re: about TRIM/DISCARD support and barriers

[James Bottomley]

On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 13:39 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > We don't attempt to put non-contiguous ranges into a single TRIM yet.
> 
> We don't even merge contiguous ranges -- I still need to fix the
> elevators to stop writes crossing writes,

I don't think we want to do that ... it's legal if the write isn't a
barrier and it will inhibit merging.  That may be just fine for a SSD,
but it's not for spinning media since they get better performance out of
merged writes.

>  before we can stop discards
> from also being barriers. (Discards are just writes, for the purpose of
> that conversation).

Perhaps they shouldn't be ... they have different characteristics.  For
instance, a discard may cross a read or write that has no sectors in
common with it; a discard may be merged as a non contiguous range
(assuming the drive supports multiple ranges), etc.

I think it might be better to give it its own type for the elevators.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/