Re: [PATCH 30 of 38] xen: implement io_apic_ops

[H. Peter Anvin]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> it certainly looks thin enough to me although i'm really not sure we 
> want to virtualize at the IO-APIC level. Peter, what's your 
> opinion/preference?
> 

Not having studied the Xen code in detail, but my assumption would be
that we should allocate this at the IRQ chip level rather than violating
the IO-APIC code.  I also (as previously discussed) really want to see a
dynamic allocator for IRQ numbers like PowerPC already has.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/