Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpumask: centralize cpu_online_map and cpu_possible_map

[Russell King]

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:07:16AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> diff -r c8ab7f6fc5e8 kernel/cpu.c
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c	Fri Oct 31 10:48:30 2008 +1100
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c	Fri Oct 31 11:22:29 2008 +1100
> @@ -24,19 +24,20 @@ cpumask_t cpu_present_map __read_mostly;
>  cpumask_t cpu_present_map __read_mostly;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_present_map);
>  
> -#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> -
>  /*
>   * Represents all cpu's that are currently online.
>   */
> -cpumask_t cpu_online_map __read_mostly = CPU_MASK_ALL;
> +cpumask_t cpu_online_map __read_mostly;

Just a question: in the uniprocessor case, does this mean that
cpu_online_map becomes zero or do we mark cpu0 as online somewhere?
I couldn't see it in this patch.

I'm just wondering from a review point of view whether this change
of initialization could have undesirable side effects.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/