Re: [patch] sched: fix inconsistency when redistribute per-cputg->cfs_rq shares.

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Nov 19 2008 - 12:40:12 EST



* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 22:41 -0800, Ken Chen wrote:
> > In the update_shares() path leading to tg_shares_up(), the calculation of
> > per-cpu cfs_rq shares is rather erratic even under moderate task wake up
> > rate. The problem is that the per-cpu tg->cfs_rq load weight used in the
> > sd_rq_weight aggregation and actual redistribution of the cfs_rq->shares
> > are collected at different time. Under moderate system load, we've seen
> > quite a bit of variation on the cfs_rq->shares and ultimately wildly
> > affects sched_entity's load weight.
>
> Another thing we could possibly do is put a low-pass filter on the
> per-cpu load values so that we smooth out the fluctuations, hmm?
>
> > This patch caches the result of initial per-cpu load weight when doing the
> > sum calculation, and then pass it down to update_group_shares_cpu() for
> > redistributing per-cpu cfs_rq shares. This allows consistent total cfs_rq
> > shares across all CPUs. It also simplifies the rounding and zero load
> > weight check.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <kenchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This does indeed look much better, the cleanup factor alone makes it
> a worthwhile patch, he fact that is improves behaviour makes it even
> better :-)
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks Ken!

applied to tip/sched/core (for v2.6.29), thanks guys!

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/