[PATCH] help kerneloops.org dianogse suspend_test_finish better

[Arjan van de Ven]

Hi Linus,

please apply this patch to the 2.6.28-rc series; it will help kerneloops.org
to better diagnose the warning in suspend_test_finish(), which is currently
very hot but is lacking the essential detail of which component is causing 
the badness...



From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:56:51 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] suspend: use WARN not WARN_ON to print the message

By using WARN(), kerneloops.org can collect which component is causing
the delay and make statistics about that. suspend_test_finish() is
currently the number 2 item but unless we can collect who's causing
it we're not going to be able to fix the hot topic ones..

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/power/main.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/power/main.c b/kernel/power/main.c
index 19122cf..b8f7ce9 100644
--- a/kernel/power/main.c
+++ b/kernel/power/main.c
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void suspend_test_finish(const char *label)
 	 * has some performance issues.  The stack dump of a WARN_ON
 	 * is more likely to get the right attention than a printk...
 	 */
-	WARN_ON(msec > (TEST_SUSPEND_SECONDS * 1000));
+	WARN(msec > (TEST_SUSPEND_SECONDS * 1000), "Component: %s\n", label);
 }
 
 #else
-- 
1.6.0.3



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/