Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: ia32_signal: cleanup macro COPY

From: Hiroshi Shimamoto
Date: Mon Nov 17 2008 - 12:57:34 EST


AmÃrico Wang wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:24 AM, Hiroshi Shimamoto
> <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Impact: cleanup
>>
>> No need to use temporary variable in this case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c | 6 ++----
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
>> index e886907..a28790a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
>> @@ -197,10 +197,8 @@ struct rt_sigframe
>> /* fp state follows here */
>> };
>>
>> -#define COPY(x) { \
>> - unsigned int reg; \
>> - err |= __get_user(reg, &sc->x); \
>> - regs->x = reg; \
>> +#define COPY(x) { \
>> + err |= __get_user(regs->x, &sc->x); \
>> }

Thanks for reviewing this!

>
> Then you can also kill the braces now. :)

I guess, checkpatch will complain. Personally I don't care.

>
> What's more, if I saw it correctly, the belowing two __get_user() calls can
> also be replaced by COPY().

I'm sorry, I cannot catch about this. Which __get_user()?

thanks,
Hiroshi Shimamoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/