Re: [PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq v13

[Mike Travis]

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> so we have one list to map domain/bus/dev/func to bits [31,12] in irq ?
>>
> 
> That works, although having a more generic allocation mechanism which
> isn't so tied to MSI-X would make more sense.
> 
> 	-hpa

Hmm, I see I picked up this conversation quite late.  I would agree that
trying to map any set of fixed bit fields to domain/bus/device/function
would be problematic (esp. since I don't understand how MSI's figure into
the deal.)

Is there some reason why we need that?

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/