[patch 2.6.28-rc5] regulator: improved mode error checks

From: David Brownell
Date: Sun Nov 16 2008 - 18:05:42 EST


From: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Minor bugfixes in handling of regulator modes:

- have the routine verifying regulator modes check against
the set of legal modes (!);

- have regulator_set_optimum_mode() verify the return value
of regulator_ops.get_optimum_mode(), like drms_uA_update();

- one call to regulator_ops.set_mode() treated zero as a
failure code; make this consistent with other callers.

Both regulator_set_mode() and regulator_set_optimum_mode() now
require valid_ops_mask to include REGULATOR_CHANGE_MODE; that
seems like a bugfix too.

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -174,6 +174,16 @@ static int regulator_check_current_limit
/* operating mode constraint check */
static int regulator_check_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int mode)
{
+ switch (mode) {
+ case REGULATOR_MODE_FAST:
+ case REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL:
+ case REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE:
+ case REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY:
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (!rdev->constraints) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: no constraints for %s\n", __func__,
rdev->desc->name);
@@ -1463,7 +1473,8 @@ int regulator_set_optimum_mode(struct re
mode = rdev->desc->ops->get_optimum_mode(rdev,
input_uV, output_uV,
total_uA_load);
- if (ret <= 0) {
+ ret = regulator_check_mode(rdev, mode);
+ if (ret < 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: failed to get optimum mode for %s @"
" %d uA %d -> %d uV\n", __func__, rdev->desc->name,
total_uA_load, input_uV, output_uV);
@@ -1471,7 +1482,7 @@ int regulator_set_optimum_mode(struct re
}

ret = rdev->desc->ops->set_mode(rdev, mode);
- if (ret <= 0) {
+ if (ret < 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: failed to set optimum mode %x for %s\n",
__func__, mode, rdev->desc->name);
goto out;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/