Re: [PATCH 3/3] Remove CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM

[Alan Cox]

> if just that patch doesn't make it, well, ok for me. I just think
> CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM is superfluous when the runtime configuration
> option is present.

It should always be "N" because the only other option means "add
pointless code of no value whatsoever"

Which means strict_devmem really belongs in the bitbucket as a bad idea

Alan


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/