Re: tcp_tw_recycle broken?

[Karl Pickett]

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Karl Pickett" <karl.pickett@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> May I just confirm.. is tcp_tw_reuse NOT dependent on receiving timestamps?
>
> The big problem is that both are incompatible with NAT. So if you
> ever talk to any NATed clients don't use it.
>
> -Andi
>
> --
> ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>


Hmph.  Running the test again - after getting a little sleep -
timestamps do indeed determine if tw_reuse/recyle work.  I must not
have let all the tw buckets expire before changing my timestamp
settings last night.

Since
A. I don't want to rely on arbitrary web servers having timestamps
B. People say it breaks NAT for clients, and the settings are global only,

I will just set TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN to 10 seconds and call it a day.
Sure would be nice if it was a tunable, so only the most heavily
loaded customers could set it...

-- 
Karl Pickett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/