Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Nov 11 2008 - 04:55:19 EST



* Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > OTOH, unless i'm misreading them, it's a bit hard to compare them
> > visually: the integral of the histograms does not seem to be
> > constant, they dont seem to be normalized.
>
> The total number of measured intervals (between two almost-adjacent
> rdtsc's) is exactly the same for all histograms (10^10). Almost all
> measurements are of the "nothing happened" type, i.e., around 11
> clock cycles on this machine. The user time spent inside the
> rdtsctest program is almost independent of the load, but it measures
> time spent outside of the program... But what should be attributed
> to what effect is unclear to me at the moment.

a high-pass filter should be applied in any case, to filter out the
"nothing happened" baseline. Eliminating every delta below 500-1000
cycles would do the trick i think, all IRQ costs are at least 1000
cycles.

then a low-pass filter should be applied to eliminate non-irq noise
such as scheduling effects or expensive irqs (which are both
uninteresting to such analysis).

and then _that_ double-filtered dataset should be normalized: the
number of events should be made the same. (just clip the larger
dataset to the length of the smaller dataset)

> > It should be made constant for them to be comparable. (i.e. the
> > total number of irq hits profiled should be equal - or should be
> > normalized with the sum after the fact)
>
> Basically the difference between the "idle" and "hack10" versions
> should indicate the effect of extra interrupts (timer) and
> additional exceptions and cache effects due to context switching.

i was only looking at before/after duos, for the same basic type of
workload. Idle versus hackbench is indeed apples to oranges.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/