Re: [PATCH] kprobe: increase kprobe_hash_table size

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Hi Andrew,

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:44:30 -0500 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Increase the size of kprobe hash table to 512. It's useful when hundreds
>> of kprobes were used in the kernel because current size is just 64.
>>
> 
> "useful" is a bit vague.  How big is the problem which this solves, and
> how well did it solve it?

For example, when probing enters and exits of syscall-related functions,
we need more than 500 probes. In that case, each hlist would have 8
elements in average. With this patch, the hlist would have 1 element in
average.

I agree that there may be many opinions about what is the best suited size.
Why I chose 512 was that I thought the table (byte) size was less than or
equal 4096 even on 64-bit arch.

> See, someone (me) needs to decide whether to merge this and if so,
> whether to merge it into 2.6.29, 2.6.28, 2.6.27.x, 2.6.26.x and
> 2.6.25.x.  I'll need more information to make that decision, but I do
> not have it.

I think this improves performance just a bit.
So I think it would not be needed for 2.6.27.x or older kernel.

Thank you,

> 
>> --- 2.6.28-rc3.orig/kernel/kprobes.c
>> +++ 2.6.28-rc3/kernel/kprobes.c
>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
>>  #include <asm/errno.h>
>>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>
>> -#define KPROBE_HASH_BITS 6
>> +#define KPROBE_HASH_BITS 9
>>  #define KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE (1 << KPROBE_HASH_BITS)
> 
> 

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/