Re: [patch 2/4] io controller: biocgroup implementation

From: Vivek Goyal
Date: Fri Nov 07 2008 - 09:47:51 EST


On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 11:50:30AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:30:24 -0500
> vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >
> > o biocgroup functionality.
> > o Implemented new controller "bio"
> > o Most of it picked from dm-ioband biocgroup implementation patches.
> >
> page_cgroup implementation is changed and most of this patch needs rework.
> please see the latest one. (I think most of new characteristics are useful
> for you.)
>

Sure I will have a look.

> One comment from me is
> ==
> > +struct page_cgroup {
> > + struct list_head lru; /* per cgroup LRU list */
> > + struct page *page;
> > + struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
> > + int flags;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_BIO
> > + struct list_head blist; /* for bio_cgroup page list */
> > + struct bio_cgroup *bio_cgroup;
> > +#endif
> > +};
> ==
>
> this blist is too bad. please keep this object small...
>

This is just another connecting element so that page_cgroup can be on another
list also. It is useful in making sure that IO on all the pages of a bio
group has completed beofer that bio cgroup is deleted.

> Maybe dm-ioband people will post his own new one. just making use of it is an idea.

Sure, I will have a look when dm-ioband people post new version of patch
and how they have optimized it further.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/