Re: [PATCH] [REPOST #2] mm: show node to memory sectionrelationship with symlinks in sysfs

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Nov 05 2008 - 15:36:42 EST


On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:48:08 -0800
Gary Hade <garyhade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Show node to memory section relationship with symlinks in sysfs
>
> Add /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/memoryY symlinks for all
> the memory sections located on nodeX. For example:
> /sys/devices/system/node/node1/memory135 -> ../../memory/memory135
> indicates that memory section 135 resides on node1.
>
> Also revises documentation to cover this change as well as updating
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-memory to include descriptions
> of memory hotremove files 'phys_device', 'phys_index', and 'state'
> that were previously not described there.
>
> In addition to it always being a good policy to provide users with
> the maximum possible amount of physical location information for
> resources that can be hot-added and/or hot-removed, the following
> are some (but likely not all) of the user benefits provided by
> this change.
> Immediate:
> - Provides information needed to determine the specific node
> on which a defective DIMM is located. This will reduce system
> downtime when the node or defective DIMM is swapped out.
> - Prevents unintended onlining of a memory section that was
> previously offlined due to a defective DIMM. This could happen
> during node hot-add when the user or node hot-add assist script
> onlines _all_ offlined sections due to user or script inability
> to identify the specific memory sections located on the hot-added
> node. The consequences of reintroducing the defective memory
> could be ugly.
> - Provides information needed to vary the amount and distribution
> of memory on specific nodes for testing or debugging purposes.
> Future:
> - Will provide information needed to identify the memory
> sections that need to be offlined prior to physical removal
> of a specific node.
>
> Symlink creation during boot was tested on 2-node x86_64, 2-node
> ppc64, and 2-node ia64 systems. Symlink creation during physical
> memory hot-add tested on a 2-node x86_64 system.
>
> Supersedes the "mm: show memory section to node relationship in sysfs"
> patch posted on 05 Sept 2008 which created node ID containing 'node'
> files in /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryX instead of symlinks.
> Changed from files to symlinks due to feedback that symlinks were
> more consistent with the sysfs way.
>
> ...
>
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-memory | 51 +++++++
> Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt | 16 +-
> arch/ia64/mm/init.c | 2
> arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 2
> arch/s390/mm/init.c | 2
> arch/sh/mm/init.c | 3
> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 2
> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 2
> drivers/base/memory.c | 19 +-
> drivers/base/node.c | 100 +++++++++++++++
> include/linux/memory.h | 6
> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 2
> include/linux/node.h | 13 +
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 9 -
> 14 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

Dumb question: why do this with a symlink forest instead of, say, cat
/proc/sys/vm/mem-sections?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/