Re: [PATCH -tip/cpus4096-v2] cpumask: fix cpumask of call_function_data

[Hiroshi Shimamoto]

Rusty Russell wrote:
...
> From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> cpumask: smp_call_function_many()
> 
> Actually change smp_call_function_mask() to smp_call_function_many().
> 
> S390 has its own version, so we do trivial conversion on that too.
> 
> We have to do some dancing to figure out if 0 or 1 other cpus are in
> the mask supplied and the online mask without allocating a tmp
> cpumask.  It's still fairly cheap.
> 
> We allocate the cpumask at the end of the call_function_data
> structure: if allocation fails we fallback to smp_call_function_single
> rather than using the baroque quiescing code.
> 
> (Thanks to Hiroshi Shimamoto for spotting several bugs in previous versions!)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx

Hi Rusty,

I'd like to know which tree this patch is against for.

thanks,
Hiroshi Shimamoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/