Re: upstream regression (IO-APIC?)

From: Robert Hancock
Date: Wed Oct 29 2008 - 20:34:52 EST

Next message: Kay Sievers: "driver core: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(),dev_set_name()"
Previous message: Tejun Heo: "Re: Timeout regression introduced by 242f9dcb8ba6f68fcd217a119a7648a4f69290e9"
In reply to: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "upstream regression (IO-APIC?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

The current Linus tree as of commit e946217e4fdaa67681bbabfa8e6b18641921f750
is broken for me. I get either the following panic (see log from qemu below)
or lost IRQs on ATA init... Is this a known issue?

PS The tree that I used before and was supposedly good (sorry, I'm too tired
to verify it now) had commit 57f8f7b60db6f1ed2c6918ab9230c4623a9dbe37 at head.

What's the bootup dmesg from a working kernel?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Kay Sievers: "driver core: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(),dev_set_name()"
Previous message: Tejun Heo: "Re: Timeout regression introduced by 242f9dcb8ba6f68fcd217a119a7648a4f69290e9"
In reply to: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "upstream regression (IO-APIC?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]