Re: [PATCH] cleanup paccept

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:09:51PM -0400, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> This patch doesn't change *any* functionality from what is currently
> in the upstream kernel.  There is no reason to start arguing again and
> for me to explain everything the way I did it months ago.  This is just
> a *cleanup patch*, nothing else.  If you want to know why this cleanup
> is needed read the discussions of

Umm, it does enabled functionality that wasn't enabled before.  And that
functionality includes a syscall.  So any chance you could write a
proper changelog that describes what you actually do instead of lots of
ranting and references to old posts?

And no "[PATCH] cleanup paccept" isn't really a good subject for adding
a new syscalls either.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/