Re: [PATCH 2/3] Implement generic freeze feature

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:58:54 +0900 Takashi Sato <t-sato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> -void thaw_bdev(struct block_device *bdev, struct super_block *sb)
> +int thaw_bdev(struct block_device *bdev, struct super_block *sb)
>  {
> +	int error = 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex);
> +	if (!bdev->bd_fsfreeze_count) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex);
> +		return -EINVAL;

This would be a programming error, yes?

If so, a WARN_ON is more appropriate than a silent runtime error.

> +	}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/