Re: [PATCH] gdrom: Fix compile error

[Al Viro]

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:32:27AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Return value and argument of block_device_operations.release of gdrom
> was changed.
> This patch fix this problem.

Serves me right for snide comments about the benefits of compile-testing ;-)
ACKed-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

FWIW, sh/sh64 is the only cross-toolchain needed for the kernel I hadn't
managed to build - 4.3.0 gcc manages to trigger internal error in sh64 as(1)
(2.18.50.0.6) and AFAICS the same should happen with any binutils up to
-HEAD (the minimal testcase is
        .text
.LFB2:
        .section        .eh_frame,"a",@progbits
        .quad   .LFB2-.
and sh64 gcc4.3 routinely produces such things in its output).  gcc trunk
seems to have arseloads of changes in gcc/config/sh and I hadn't got around
to attempting a backport ;-/

Are there any public sh/sh64 toolchains based on not too heavily hacked
gcc/binutils, ideally for more or less recent variants of both?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/