Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add support for userspace stacktraces in tracing/iter_ctrl

[Török Edwin]

On 2008-10-26 15:29, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 09:15 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>   
>> "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Weisbecker?=" <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>     
>>> [...]
>>>       
>>>> +/* Userspace stacktrace - based on kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c */
>>>> +
>>>> +struct stack_frame {
>>>> +       const void __user       *next_fp;
>>>> +       unsigned long           return_address;
>>>> +};
>>>>         
>>> [...]
>>>       
>> To what extent does this actually work, and on which architectures?
>> While the kernel appears willing to sacrifice some performance for
>> functionality by building with frame pointers at the drop of a tracing
>> hat, userspace is not like that.
>>     
>
> Aww, common, Gentoo is brilliant for that :-)
>
> CFLAGS+=-fframe-pointer
>
> emerge -uDNe world
>
> Then again, you'd better not have all that desktop bloat installed,
> otherwise that will take ages.. KDE/OOo compile times anyone?
>
> /me runs

It should be enough to rebuild the application you are tracing[1] +
libraries, or at least libc.
In userspace I can get a stacktrace using DWARF unwind info, but doing
that in the kernel would be too expensive, right?

[1] assuming you are tracing latencies in a single application

Best regards,
--Edwin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/