Re: [PATCH] n-tty-output-bells-immediately

[Joe Peterson]

Alan Cox wrote:
> Ok without randomly hitting send this time...
> 
> LC/UC and control characters looks right.  (except the added white space)
> Buffer sizing looks fine
> Bell definitely a good idea
> 
> Those three applied with better subject lines and queued for .29
> 
> The last one I'm rather less happy with but want to ponder a bit more the
> best way to handle.

All sounds good - thanks.  Yes, let's think a bit more about the last
one.  The problem, as I see it now, is that only the ldisc knows how to
treat certain chars, but the input buffers get clogged before they get
to the ldisc.  Perhaps devising a way for upstream input code to call
the ldisc to inform it that there is a "signal pending/queued" (i.e.
SIGINT, SIGQUIT, SIGSTP) or a tty restart (e.g. ^Q) queued...

BTW, where are the patches sitting at this point?  I saw an email about
"linux-next" that lists just the first of the 3 (the drop bkl one); and
your tty git is now empty.  Just curious.

					Thanks!  Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/