Re: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (v2)

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi David,

On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:44:01 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Serge E. Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I've just tested with David's plain creds-v3 tree
> 
> Note the creds-v4 branch is now current.  Is it worth me replacing that with a
> tree that just has a master branch to simplify things?

It would be good if you could have a "next" (or "creds-next" or
something) branch in your tree and I can fetch that (that way I don't
have to keep updating my configs).  It is OK if thet branch rebases and
may just be an alias for another branch (or a subset if you have
experimental stuff in there.  Remember "posted, reviewed, tested before
it is in linux-next".

Thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature