Re: [bug] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with structcpumask

[Ingo Molnar]

* Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > ok, the new cpumask code blew up in -tip testing, with various sorts of 
> > slab corruptions during scheduler init:
> > 
> ...
>
> Curious thing happens here.  I created the tree as you suggested 
> (branch tip/cpus4096-v2) and copied in your .config file.  Running it 
> through "silentoldconfig" (choosing only the defaults), I get the 
> following changes.  This makes me suspect that I'm not testing the 
> same thing as you are...?  Perhaps my git setup was not correct?

no - i have some extras that forces on SMP for example to make it more 
likely to trigger in random tests (it's far more interesting from a QA 
point of view than UP).

so as long as you select SMP you should get the same config. Lemme do a 
.config you can plug in.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/