Re: [PATCH 0/2] enable irqs when waiting for rwlocks

[Robin Holt]

On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:31:53AM -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> Petr Tesarik wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> SGI has observed that on large systems, interrupts are not serviced for
>> a long period of time when waiting for a rwlock. The following patch
>> series re-enables irqs while waiting for the lock, resembling the code
>> which is already there for spinlocks.
>
> Perhaps I'm just out in left field, but that (and the similar behaviour  
> for obtaining a spinlock?) feels like treating a symptom rather than a  
> root cause where the root cause would appear to be long lock hold  
> times/contention?

Sometimes lock contention on large systems will take a few seconds to
pass.  This is normal behavior which simply can not be eliminated.  For
those cases, we need to rely upon being able to re-enable interrupts and
allowing other operations to continue normally.  Simply put, in some
cases, nothing more can be done.

Thanks,
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/