Re: [PATCH 22/35] cpumask: deprecate any_online_cpu() in favour ofcpumask_any/cpumask_any_and From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

From: Mike Travis
Date: Thu Oct 23 2008 - 08:56:35 EST


Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> any_online_cpu() is a good name, but it takes a cpumask_t, not a
>> pointer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
>
> almost all the patches have a missing \n and thus wrong authorship...
>
> Ingo

Hmm, that's strange. It might be the way quilt mail gathers everything up
into mbox format. I'll experiment a little bit to see what's causing it.
(This is the first time I've used the From: line as well as subject lines
w/o Subject: preceeding them.)

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/