Re: [PATCH 35/35] x86: clean up speedctep-centrino and reducecpumask_t usage From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

[Ingo Molnar]

* Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thursday 23 October 2008 13:09:01 Mike Travis wrote:
> > 1) The #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU seems unnecessary these days.
> > 2) The loop can simply skip over offline cpus, rather than creating a tmp
> > mask.
> > 3) set_mask is set to either a single cpu or all online cpus in a 
> > policy. Since it's just used for set_cpus_allowed(), any offline cpus in a
> > policy don't matter, so we can just use cpumask_of_cpu() or the
> > policy->cpus.
> 
> Note that this cleanup stands alone; it's just that I read this code I 
> couldn't help but tidy it up.
> 
> Ingo: do you just want to put this in your normal tree for sending to 
> Linus?

hm, cpufreq stuff belongs into davej's tree.

i skipped #34 and #35 for now, we can live without them, correct?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/