Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers
From: Cyrill Gorcunov
Date: Wed Oct 22 2008 - 14:42:28 EST
[Christoph Lameter - Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:24:58AM -0700]
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> [Christoph Lameter - Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:10:56AM -0700]
>>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>>>> +#define OO_SHIFT 16
>>>> +#define OO_MASK ((1 << OO_SHIFT) - 1)
>>>> +#define MAX_OBJS_PER_PAGE 65535 /* see struct page.objects */
>>> This is == OO_MASK right? Otherwise things will break when we change
>> Yes, I set it 65535 directly to distinguish it from OO_MASK
>> meaning not value and point to page.objects since they are
>> u16. Which meant that is the point where all limits start.
>> So it we set OO_SHIFT to say 14 it will not be a problem
>> but if we exceed 16 bits it will break SLUB. Am I right?
>> (I become scratching the head :)
> If you set it > 16 then the size of the field in struct page is violated.
> #define MAX_OBJ_PER_PAGE MIN(1 << bits_in(page.objects) - 1, OO_MASK)
I think the patch becomes more complicated as it should be.
Maybe just use:
#define MAX_OBJ_PER_PAGE 65535 /* since page.objects is u16 */
- Cyrill -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/