[PATCH] procfs: use WARN() rather than printk+backtrace

[Arjan van de Ven]

Use WARN() rather than a printk() + backtrace();
this gives a more standard format message as well as complete
information (including line numbers etc) that will be collected
by kerneloops.org

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/proc/generic.c |    3 +--
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/generic.c b/fs/proc/generic.c
index 7821589..60a359b 100644
--- a/fs/proc/generic.c
+++ b/fs/proc/generic.c
@@ -547,9 +547,8 @@ static int proc_register(struct proc_dir_entry * dir, struct proc_dir_entry * dp
 
 	for (tmp = dir->subdir; tmp; tmp = tmp->next)
 		if (strcmp(tmp->name, dp->name) == 0) {
-			printk(KERN_WARNING "proc_dir_entry '%s/%s' already registered\n",
+			WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "proc_dir_entry '%s/%s' already registered\n",
 				dir->name, dp->name);
-			dump_stack();
 			break;
 		}
 
-- 
1.5.5.1



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/