Re: Subject: [PATCH 01/16] Squashfs: inode operations

[Phillip Lougher]

JÃrn Engel wrote:
> None of the comments below are a reason against mainline inclusion, imo.
> They should get handled, but whether that happens before or after a
> merge doesn't really matter.

Yeah you're right regarding your comments.  That's where code-review 
comes in handy, to spot things you don't see because you're too used to 
the code.

I'm working on a re-spin incorporating your comments, and it should be 
ready tomorrow.

Thanks for the code-review.

Phillip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/