Re: [ANNOUNCE] iommu-2.6.git tree
From: David Woodhouse
Date: Mon Oct 20 2008 - 05:08:12 EST
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 10:52 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> What was not fine for you was to declare tip/auto-iommu-next the 'old'
> tree and to request a zapping of linux-next's auto-iommu-next
> integration, unilaterally.
I didn't ask for it to be removed. Stephen asked if he should remove it,
and given my conversation with Thomas I said that I _believe_ that was
the plan. After all, the old tree already didn't seem to exist any more,
even though there were outstanding patches which need to be merged. But
I made sure I didn't give a definitive answer to Stephen's question, and
I made sure you and Thomas were both on Cc when I said it.
If that was offensive to you, then I apologise.
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx Intel Corporation
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/