Re: [PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: simplify marker_set_format()

[Lai Jiangshan]

Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Lai Jiangshan (laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>> current marker_set_format() is complex this patch simplify it, 
>> and decrease the overhead of marker_update_probes().
>>
> 
> Yep, I think I did put the format string after the name \0, which was
> rather tricky. I agree that such change makes the code more readable at
> the expense of doing 2 allocations per marker rather than one, but
> readability might be a good thing here.
> 
> Thanks !
> 
> Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 

Hi, Ingo

Do you have any objections against these patches?
[PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: simplify marker_set_format()
[PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: remove exported symbol marker_probe_cb_noarg()
[PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: let marker_table be close to its comments

My new patch are being made on the top of these patches.
new patch:
[PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: new callbacks manager
new patch remove a lot code and speed up critical region
and not change any APIs.

new patch change too much code, so I have to wait until all known
patches(which can be applied) have been applied.

Thanks, Lai




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/