Re: [ANNOUNCE] iommu-2.6.git tree

From: David Woodhouse
Date: Sat Oct 18 2008 - 11:52:22 EST

On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 02:43 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Sure (I assume the "master" branch).

Yes. I don't use branches in public-facing repositories -- it's much
better just to have separate trees.

> However, I already have a tree in -next called iommu. It is one of the
> tip auto branches (auto-iommu-next) and is currently empty. So do I name
> this one dwmw2-iommu, or has Ingo finished with the other one?

I believe the plan is that Ingo has finished with the other one and we
use the new one instead, yes.

David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx Intel Corporation

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at